<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_ASSIGNED "
title="ASSIGNED --- - [BDW regression] System hung while booting on 32 bit OS"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76619#c36">Comment # 36</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_ASSIGNED "
title="ASSIGNED --- - [BDW regression] System hung while booting on 32 bit OS"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76619">bug 76619</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:jani.nikula@intel.com" title="Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>"> <span class="fn">Jani Nikula</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=76619#c16">comment #16</a>)
<span class="quote">> (In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=76619#c14">comment #14</a>)
> > Created <span class="bz_obsolete"><a href="attachment.cgi?id=96472" name="attach_96472" title="Clamp to 2G address space with 32b platforms">attachment 96472</a> <a href="attachment.cgi?id=96472&action=edit" title="Clamp to 2G address space with 32b platforms">[details]</a></span> <a href='page.cgi?id=splinter.html&bug=76619&attachment=96472'>[review]</a> [review] [review]
> > Clamp to 2G address space with 32b platforms
> >
> > We can probably do 3, but whatever.
>
> I am not sure the exactly mean of this. Should this patch be work with other
> patches mention above, or it can works only?
>
> with this patch only, the system still hung while booting.</span >
I do not understand why #ifndef CONFIG_64BIT does not work...
(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=76619#c33">comment #33</a>)
<span class="quote">> Created <span class=""><a href="attachment.cgi?id=100018" name="attach_100018" title="dmesg">attachment 100018</a> <a href="attachment.cgi?id=100018&action=edit" title="dmesg">[details]</a></span>
> dmesg
>
> (In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=76619#c32">comment #32</a>)
> > Please test v5
> With the patch v5, the system is able to boot normally.</span >
...but #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32 works.
The latter is probably more correct, but really, under what circumstances would
CONFIG_64BIT=y hold when CONFIG_X86_32=y? Indeed the attached kernel config
does *not* have CONFIG_64BIT=y.
Something is wrong with the test results.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>