<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEEDINFO " title="NEEDINFO --- - KDE Konsole very slow scrolling with TearFree and QT graphics system native" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77436#c87">Comment # 87</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEEDINFO " title="NEEDINFO --- - KDE Konsole very slow scrolling with TearFree and QT graphics system native" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77436">bug 77436</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:chris@chris-wilson.co.uk" title="Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>"> Chris Wilson</a> <pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=77436#c86">comment #86</a>) > 1st patch helps. > 2nd patch don't. > I tested them separately. Should i apply them together? Nope. They were different tress I was barking at. This is slightly more conclusive that is the glyph rendering that is producing too much load. First can you quickly test master as I tweaked placement of glyph operations. Then check diff --git a/src/sna/sna_glyphs.c b/src/sna/sna_glyphs.c index e8d92b8..5350eb0 100644 --- a/src/sna/sna_glyphs.c +++ b/src/sna/sna_glyphs.c @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ #define FALLBACK 0 #define NO_GLYPH_CACHE 0 #define NO_GLYPHS_TO_DST 0 -#define NO_GLYPHS_VIA_MASK 0 +#define NO_GLYPHS_VIA_MASK 1 #define NO_SMALL_MASK 0 #define NO_GLYPHS_SLOW 0 #define NO_DISCARD_MASK 0 and then diff --git a/src/sna/sna_glyphs.c b/src/sna/sna_glyphs.c index e8d92b8..f7b8607 100644 --- a/src/sna/sna_glyphs.c +++ b/src/sna/sna_glyphs.c @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ #define NO_GLYPH_CACHE 0 #define NO_GLYPHS_TO_DST 0 #define NO_GLYPHS_VIA_MASK 0 -#define NO_SMALL_MASK 0 +#define NO_SMALL_MASK 1 #define NO_GLYPHS_SLOW 0 #define NO_DISCARD_MASK 0</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>