<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEEDINFO " title="NEEDINFO --- - Buffer Overflow in xf86-video-intel" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80157#c30">Comment # 30</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEEDINFO " title="NEEDINFO --- - Buffer Overflow in xf86-video-intel" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80157">bug 80157</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:chris@chris-wilson.co.uk" title="Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>"> Chris Wilson</a> <pre>Created <a href="attachment.cgi?id=101774" name="attach_101774" title="Hook into ClientGone">attachment 101774</a> <a href="attachment.cgi?id=101774&action=edit" title="Hook into ClientGone">[details]</a> <a href='page.cgi?id=splinter.html&bug=80157&attachment=101774'>[review]</a> Hook into ClientGone That last valgrind log is more like what I was expecting. Having thought some more, I realise that is possible for Windows to outlive their Clients, and so we do need to hook into the Client destructor. Please test the attached patch.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>