<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - [ALL Regression] master device leak"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80745#c9">Comment # 9</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - [ALL Regression] master device leak"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80745">bug 80745</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:eero.t.tamminen@intel.com" title="Eero Tamminen <eero.t.tamminen@intel.com>"> <span class="fn">Eero Tamminen</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=80745#c8">comment #8</a>)
<span class="quote">> It can be reproduced with just X. However higher frequency seems to
> correlate with having multiple active DRI clients and sending a kill signal
> to X.</span >
So correct steps are re-starting also X, not just DRI clients on top of X? Is
e.g. glxgears enough?
Bug descriptions says that this doesn't happen on IVB/BYT-M/BDW, but title
states "ALL". Which one is correct?</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>