<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - ZaphodHeads need O_NONBLOCK suppor" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84744#c18">Comment # 18</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - ZaphodHeads need O_NONBLOCK suppor" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84744">bug 84744</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:gentoo@gishpuppy.com" title="M. G. <gentoo@gishpuppy.com>"> M. G.</a> <pre>Wow, many thanks for the fast fix! Now everything works as desired. Great! I noticed that your drm:nonblock patch is already over one year old. How about the chances that the patch will become part of the mainline kernel? And one last question: Is the TearFree option unsupported with ZaphodHeads? I get a segfault if I have it in my xorg.conf (no difference whether it is in both Device sections or just in one): (EE) Backtrace: (EE) 0: /usr/bin/X (xorg_backtrace+0x42) [0x58f872] (EE) 1: /usr/bin/X (0x400000+0x193519) [0x593519] (EE) 2: /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x7f13603f1000+0x11250) [0x7f1360402250] (EE) 3: /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/intel_drv.so (0x7f135c54f000+0x6f5bb) [0x7f135c5be5bb] (EE) 4: /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/intel_drv.so (0x7f135c54f000+0x6f4ee) [0x7f135c5be4ee] (EE) 5: /usr/bin/X (WakeupHandler+0x9c) [0x43f79c] (EE) 6: /usr/bin/X (WaitForSomething+0x1a4) [0x58d094] (EE) 7: /usr/bin/X (0x400000+0x3ab81) [0x43ab81] (EE) 8: /usr/bin/X (0x400000+0x3ebea) [0x43ebea] (EE) 9: /lib64/libc.so.6 (__libc_start_main+0xf5) [0x7f135f076db5] (EE) 10: /usr/bin/X (0x400000+0x29641) [0x429641] (EE) (EE) Segmentation fault at address 0x7fff2953f050</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>