<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [IVB/BYT/HSW Bisected]Synmark2_DrvCtx performance reduced 50%~80% (PPGTT)"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84501#c7">Comment # 7</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [IVB/BYT/HSW Bisected]Synmark2_DrvCtx performance reduced 50%~80% (PPGTT)"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84501">bug 84501</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:chris@chris-wilson.co.uk" title="Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>"> <span class="fn">Chris Wilson</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Eero Tamminen from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=84501#c6">comment #6</a>)
<span class="quote">> Looking at the numbers, this seems to have been fixed on 23rd? If this is
> the case, please mark bug fixed, so that it can be verified.</span >
Nope. The bug is a transient leak of the vm space and remains unfixed. Given
sufficient stress, all that is required is for a client to open/close many
contexts, and the aperture will be filled with inactive contexts until we are
forced to evict all the inactive contexts to make space for a new one. Whether
or not it impacts synmark, we can and should write an igt to try and
demonstrate the DoS.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>