<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEEDINFO " title="NEEDINFO - [BYT/BSW]igt/gem_concurrent_blit kms_flip and gem_reset_stats sporadically causes *ERROR* Timed out: waiting for Render to ack" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87184#c6">Comment # 6</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEEDINFO " title="NEEDINFO - [BYT/BSW]igt/gem_concurrent_blit kms_flip and gem_reset_stats sporadically causes *ERROR* Timed out: waiting for Render to ack" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87184">bug 87184</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:huax.lu@intel.com" title="lu hua <huax.lu@intel.com>"> lu hua</a> <pre>(In reply to Rodrigo Vivi from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=87184#c5">comment #5</a>) > Does it also affect BDW? Run ./kms_flip --run-subtest flip-vs-panning-vs-hang 5 cycles on BDW, it doesn't have this error. > What happens with ppgtt disabled? I will give it a try. > Why is it critical? What is customer impact here? More than 200 cases have this error on BYT/BSW. gem_reset_stats has 53 subcases kms_flip has 80+ subcase, gem_concurrent_blit has 108 subcases. And the result is unstable, It will interfere with result check and prts bisect. We hope we could focus on real regression and new case's fail, So disabled these cases. If these unstable issue could be fixed in time, it's valuable. Do you think so?</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>