<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_REOPENED " title="REOPENED - [sna suse] ddx assertion hits" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70461#c86">Comment # 86</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_REOPENED " title="REOPENED - [sna suse] ddx assertion hits" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70461">bug 70461</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:chris@chris-wilson.co.uk" title="Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>"> Chris Wilson</a> <pre>(In reply to Jiri Slaby from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=70461#c83">comment #83</a>) > But I hit another one: > > #5 0x00007ff0b4984446 in __kgem_bo_is_busy (bo=<optimized out>, > kgem=0x7ff0b9c14000) at kgem.h:642 Scratching my head on this one. The assertion looks correct, it is checking that having found a bo now idle that after retiring all the requests upto and including that holding the bo, we have marked the bo itself as idle But the code looks correct. commit 3cb0672586a55effa89a59c9a97744e225a05dac Author: Chris Wilson <<a href="mailto:chris@chris-wilson.co.uk">chris@chris-wilson.co.uk</a>> Date: Thu Jan 22 21:02:42 2015 +0000 sna: Reorganise assertions when retiring idle bo References: <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_REOPENED " title="REOPENED - [sna suse] ddx assertion hits" href="show_bug.cgi?id=70461#c83">https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70461#c83</a> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <<a href="mailto:chris@chris-wilson.co.uk">chris@chris-wilson.co.uk</a>> Let's apply that and see if that cleans up the assertion stacktrace a bit.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>