<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - 4.0-rc1 kernel GPU hang: ecode 3:0:0x02faffcf (i915) stuck on render ring ecode 3:0:0x02faffcf"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89334#c21">Comment # 21</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - 4.0-rc1 kernel GPU hang: ecode 3:0:0x02faffcf (i915) stuck on render ring ecode 3:0:0x02faffcf"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89334">bug 89334</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:jimmcdevitt60@gmail.com" title="Jim <jimmcdevitt60@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Jim</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>Created <span class=""><a href="attachment.cgi?id=113935" name="attach_113935" title="with gallium & both patches">attachment 113935</a> <a href="attachment.cgi?id=113935&action=edit" title="with gallium & both patches">[details]</a></span>
with gallium & both patches
With the second patch to xf86 driver the gallium driver acts like it always did
except it now logs the error in the error file. With only the first patch, the
problem does not happen nearly as much - So for the gallium driver, just the
first patch works better than both patches together.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>