<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [SKL Bisected] eDP can not be lighted up after entering kernel" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89554#c35">Comment # 35</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [SKL Bisected] eDP can not be lighted up after entering kernel" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89554">bug 89554</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:daniel@ffwll.ch" title="Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>"> Daniel Vetter</a> <pre>(In reply to Sonika from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=89554#c34">comment #34</a>) > (In reply to Jani Nikula from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=89554#c33">comment #33</a>) > > We can base it on VBT when we can trust the VBT. > > I really feel, that it should just be fixed in VBT to default value. This > table only gives the values which can be used to save power which can be > achieved with any panel which supports them and not necessarily be edp1.4. If we have shipping broken VBT out there then we can't trust it. That's how this works, because waiting for VBT to get fixed isn't an option. For pre-production it's a bit different, but again if too many ppl are affected we have to just ignore vbt unfortunately. And if a vbt escaped into the wild on shipping hw we've lost entirely. Maybe in some shiny bright future we can start to trust vbt by default, but right now that's just not reality.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>