<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [945 regression] 4.0-rc1 kernel GPU hang: ecode 3:0:0x02faffcf (i915) stuck on render ring ecode 3:0:0x02faffcf"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89334#c32">Comment # 32</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [945 regression] 4.0-rc1 kernel GPU hang: ecode 3:0:0x02faffcf (i915) stuck on render ring ecode 3:0:0x02faffcf"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89334">bug 89334</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:jimmcdevitt60@gmail.com" title="Jim <jimmcdevitt60@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Jim</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>I have not been able to test rc 6 & 7 because both versions cause X to seg
fault. I need to use UXA instead of SNA now. This was the last thing I checked
because I had ruled out SNA/UXA as a factor earlier - but since rc6 my hand is
forced to use UXA. It is a performance hit in certain areas - but still
acceptable considering...
If i go back to rc5, Using either SNA or UXB I still exhibit the same failure.
It is also the same whether I use Gallium drivers or the intel c driver.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>