<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED - [bisected BYT] complete freeze after: drm/i915/vlv: WA for Turbo and RC6 to work together"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88012#c62">Comment # 62</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED - [bisected BYT] complete freeze after: drm/i915/vlv: WA for Turbo and RC6 to work together"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88012">bug 88012</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:mazout360@gmail.com" title="Maxime Bergeron <mazout360@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Maxime Bergeron</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Andy Furniss from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=88012#c61">comment #61</a>)
<span class="quote">> 8fb55197e64d5988ec57b54e973daeea72c3f2ff
> drm/i915: Agressive downclocking on Baytrail
>
> reverted and I didn't lock, so it seems I messed up somewhere for that test
> initially.
>
> So reverting above alone does make me stable on both the nightly I first
> tested with and drm-intel-next-queued (tested as it was over the weekend).</span >
Maybe not. I just tried this (latest drm-intel-next-queued with the commit
reverted) and I locked after ~2 hours uptime (couldn't get logs, everything
hung up including ssh). Definitely more stable without the commit (less stutter
in 1080p video playback), but I had over 50 hours of uptime with 4.0.0-RC6
without any issue. Maybe there's something wrong elsewhere ?</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>