<html>
    <head>
      <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
    </head>
    <body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:conselvan2@gmail.com" title="Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <conselvan2@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Ander Conselvan de Oliveira</span></a>
</span> changed
              <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED INVALID - MST backport to 3.16 crashes"
   href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89187">bug 89187</a>
          <br>
             <table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
          <tr>
            <th>What</th>
            <th>Removed</th>
            <th>Added</th>
          </tr>

         <tr>
           <td style="text-align:right;">Status</td>
           <td>NEW
           </td>
           <td>RESOLVED
           </td>
         </tr>

         <tr>
           <td style="text-align:right;">Resolution</td>
           <td>---
           </td>
           <td>INVALID
           </td>
         </tr></table>
      <p>
        <div>
            <b><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED INVALID - MST backport to 3.16 crashes"
   href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89187#c6">Comment # 6</a>
              on <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED INVALID - MST backport to 3.16 crashes"
   href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89187">bug 89187</a>
              from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:conselvan2@gmail.com" title="Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <conselvan2@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Ander Conselvan de Oliveira</span></a>
</span></b>
        <pre>(In reply to Jani Nikula from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=89187#c5">comment #5</a>)
<span class="quote">> (In reply to Chris Wilson from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=89187#c4">comment #4</a>)
> > I don't think we expect the backport to fix all the state checking hilarity,
> > and whilst it is just the state checker WONTFIX for 3.16?

> Well, *we* are definitely not doing it, but since Dave has done the backport
> to begin with, I figured it's up to him to respond.

> OTOH this being upstream bugzilla, we might just as well resolve invalid.</span >

Dave hasn't responded by now, so let's close invalid.</pre>
        </div>
      </p>
      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
      
      <ul>
          <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>