<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [BDW regression] pm_rpm subtests fail and give WARNs" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90994#c1">Comment # 1</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [BDW regression] pm_rpm subtests fail and give WARNs" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90994">bug 90994</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:huax.lu@intel.com" title="lu hua <huax.lu@intel.com>"> lu hua</a> <pre>I also see following case fail: igt@pm_rpm@cursor-dpms igt@pm_rpm@dpms-lpsp igt@pm_rpm@dpms-mode-unset-lpsp igt@pm_rpm@dpms-non-lpsp igt@pm_rpm@drm-resources-equal igt@pm_rpm@fences-dpms igt@pm_rpm@gem-evict-pwrite igt@pm_rpm@legacy-planes-dpms igt@pm_rpm@universal-planes-dpms Bisect shows: 7f072451f2d3d53e4f6939440e15ab36afed2051 is the first bad commit. commit 7f072451f2d3d53e4f6939440e15ab36afed2051 Author: Maarten Lankhorst <<a href="mailto:maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com">maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com</a>> AuthorDate: Mon Jun 1 12:50:04 2015 +0200 Commit: Jani Nikula <<a href="mailto:jani.nikula@intel.com">jani.nikula@intel.com</a>> CommitDate: Thu Jun 4 11:44:37 2015 +0300 drm/i915: Implement intel_crtc_control using atomic state, v4 Assume the callers lock everything with drm_modeset_lock_all. This change had to be done after converting suspend/resume to use atomic_state so the atomic state is preserved, otherwise all transitional state is erased. Now all callers of .crtc_enable and .crtc_disable go through atomic modeset! :-D Changes since v1: - Only check for crtc_state->active in valleyview_modeset_global_pipes. - Only check for crtc_state->active in modeset_update_crtc_power_domains. Changes since v2: - Rework on top of the changed patch order. Changes since v3: - Rename intel_crtc_toggle in description to *_control - Change return value to int. - Do not add plane state, should be done implicitly already. Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <<a href="mailto:maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com">maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com</a>> Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <<a href="mailto:matthew.d.roper@intel.com">matthew.d.roper@intel.com</a>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <<a href="mailto:jani.nikula@intel.com">jani.nikula@intel.com</a>></pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>