<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [ivb] bright pixels appear when mousing over LibreOffice Impress"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91153#c19">Comment # 19</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [ivb] bright pixels appear when mousing over LibreOffice Impress"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91153">bug 91153</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:chris@chris-wilson.co.uk" title="Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>"> <span class="fn">Chris Wilson</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Joe Peterson from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=91153#c17">comment #17</a>)
<span class="quote">> Hi, so that's the change in libdrm, but when in xf86-video-intel did the
> code start to use the new libdrm abi?</span >
The point is the existent ABI changed. We thought we were being smart by zero
extending the field and believed it wouldn't break. But then we started passing
in nearby stack because the ioctl was passing in more data than the old struct.
(In reply to Joe Peterson from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=91153#c18">comment #18</a>)
<span class="quote">> Is it this one:?
>
> 7fe2b29 sna: Protect against ABI breakage in recent versions of libdrm</span >
Yes.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>