<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [ivb] bright pixels appear when mousing over LibreOffice Impress" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91153#c20">Comment # 20</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [ivb] bright pixels appear when mousing over LibreOffice Impress" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91153">bug 91153</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:joe@wildlava.com" title="Joe Peterson <joe@wildlava.com>"> Joe Peterson</a> <pre>(In reply to Chris Wilson from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=91153#c19">comment #19</a>) > (In reply to Joe Peterson from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=91153#c17">comment #17</a>) > > Hi, so that's the change in libdrm, but when in xf86-video-intel did the > > code start to use the new libdrm abi? > > The point is the existent ABI changed. We thought we were being smart by > zero extending the field and believed it wouldn't break. But then we started > passing in nearby stack because the ioctl was passing in more data than the > old struct. > > > (In reply to Joe Peterson from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=91153#c18">comment #18</a>) > > Is it this one:? > > > > 7fe2b29 sna: Protect against ABI breakage in recent versions of libdrm > > Yes. OK, cool. So do you expect that if I apply the patch (git diff bacaf7f..7fe2b29) to earlier versions of xf86-video-intel that it will work with new abi? I can try, but if hopeless, I'd rather know now. :)</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>