<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Apple miniDP-to-VGA adapter doesn't work anymore since Kernel 4.1"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91451#c14">Comment # 14</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Apple miniDP-to-VGA adapter doesn't work anymore since Kernel 4.1"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91451">bug 91451</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:simon@farnz.org.uk" title="Simon Farnsworth <simon@farnz.org.uk>"> <span class="fn">Simon Farnsworth</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Ville Syrjala from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=91451#c13">comment #13</a>)
<span class="quote">> (In reply to Simon Farnsworth from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=91451#c12">comment #12</a>)
> > So, a suggestion if anyone's got time to work on this:
> >
> > drm_kms_helper.dp_aux_i2c_transfer_size sets the number of bytes of I2C data
> > we try to transfer in a single DP AUX transaction; the maximum is 16, the
> > minimum is 1 byte. I have devices that need 16 bytes per transaction,
> > otherwise they fail; it looks like the Apple adapter fails if you try to
> > transfer more than 4 bytes per transaction.
> >
> > drm_dp_i2c_xfer currently only reduces the transfer size if the DP device
> > returns a partial success (e.g. 4 bytes of I2C data returned when we asked
> > for 16 will cause us to try with 4 bytes per transaction in future). With a
> > bit of care, it could also learn that when the I2C transaction reaches the
> > retry limit and the only response to DP AUX transactions was
> > DP_AUX_NATIVE_REPLY_DEFER, it's time to reduce the transaction size. Note
> > that you do expect some DP_AUX_NATIVE_REPLY_DEFERs in normal operation -
> > they're how the device tells you that it can't reply yet.
>
> I don't think we should need to reduce the transfer size. What we should do
> is figure out how long the transfer might reasonably take, and adjust our
> timeouts accordingly.</span >
If anyone with an affected adapter wants to test this, the two things to play
with, both in drm_dp_i2c_do_msg:
1. Try changing the 7 in "for (retry = 0; retry < 7; retry++) {" to 70, and
see if that helps - it *will* make things slower, by allowing 70 attempts
before a transaction fails (at 0.5 ms per attempt, so a delay of 35 ms per
failed transaction instead of 3.5 ms), but it may fix things.
2. Try changing the "500, 600" in "usleep_range(500, 600);" in the case
DP_AUX_NATIVE_REPLY_DEFER: block to "5000, 6000"; this makes us wait 5 ms
between attempts instead of 0.5 ms. Again, this will slow things down
massively, especially if you increase the retry count to 70.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>