<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_ASSIGNED " title="ASSIGNED - [BSW bisected] OglGSCloth/Lightsmark/CS/ Portal/ Half Life 2 games performance decreased by 15%-45%" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90112#c51">Comment # 51</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_ASSIGNED " title="ASSIGNED - [BSW bisected] OglGSCloth/Lightsmark/CS/ Portal/ Half Life 2 games performance decreased by 15%-45%" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90112">bug 90112</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:wendy.wang@intel.com" title="wendy.wang@intel.com">wendy.wang@intel.com</a> <pre>(In reply to Chris Wilson from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=90112#c50">comment #50</a>) > That's more consistent with mesa relying on wait-boosting to overcome its > inability to submit batches fast enough. If you trace the gpufreq do you see > it dip below max often? Yes, test on commit 8d3afd7d0e666b932e6fa15901e6280fe829a786 + BSW+ half life 2 case, most of time the actual/currentent gpufreq is equals to min GPU freq, rare chance will observe actual/currentent gpufreq up to bigger than min GPU freq or max GPU freq.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>