<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEEDINFO " title="NEEDINFO - Hangcheck timer too agressive to pass dEQP for SNBGT1" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93029#c7">Comment # 7</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEEDINFO " title="NEEDINFO - Hangcheck timer too agressive to pass dEQP for SNBGT1" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93029">bug 93029</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:mika.kuoppala@intel.com" title="Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>"> Mika Kuoppala</a> <pre>I tested this with witb bdw ppgtt=1 and execlists=0, as I didn't have snb available. I reduced the hangcheck tick to 500ms, in order to lure this condition into light. So yes the setup is far from snb. But with those changes, I added MI_NOOPs after flush and on multiple times, the actual head stayed in PIPE_CONTROL for > 500ms. I will post patches in list so we can continue discussion in there.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>