<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_ASSIGNED " title="ASSIGNED - Hangcheck timer too agressive to pass dEQP for SNBGT1" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93029#c15">Comment # 15</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_ASSIGNED " title="ASSIGNED - Hangcheck timer too agressive to pass dEQP for SNBGT1" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93029">bug 93029</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:mika.kuoppala@intel.com" title="Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>"> Mika Kuoppala</a> <pre>(In reply to Eero Tamminen from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=93029#c12">comment #12</a>) > (In reply to Mark Janes from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=93029#c10">comment #10</a>) > > With Mika's patch, spurious hangchecks can still be generated by invoking > > the the tests listed in the comments (long_running_shaders). These tests > > are blacklisted by Chrome's test suite. > > > > The good news is that all of the *intermittent* gpu hangs that were > > generated by the rest of the suite have been fixed by this patch. > > Are the still hanging tests too heavy for a slow GPU like SNB GT1? > > What if the hang period would just be increased while running them? I would like to understand the tests a little better and try to improve the heuristics, before adding a tunable. Is this still blocking a release?</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>