<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_ASSIGNED " title="ASSIGNED - Hangcheck timer too agressive to pass dEQP for SNBGT1" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93029#c17">Comment # 17</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_ASSIGNED " title="ASSIGNED - Hangcheck timer too agressive to pass dEQP for SNBGT1" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93029">bug 93029</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:mark.a.janes@intel.com" title="Mark Janes <mark.a.janes@intel.com>"> Mark Janes</a> <pre>(In reply to Eero Tamminen from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=93029#c14">comment #14</a>) > I'm not familiar with these tests. > > Why these particular tests are named as "long running", how long they're > _supposed_ to run? > > Because I know that other gfx chip drivers have also watchdogs, I'm just > wondering are they actually supposed to trigger hangcheck... Eero, you may be right about the intention of the tests, it's hard to know. However, it seems like they could use an infinite loop if they really wanted to trigger hangcheck.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>