[Intel-gfx] gem driver
keithp at keithp.com
Tue Aug 12 18:46:35 PDT 2008
On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 22:50 +0200, Lukas Hejtmanek wrote:
> I saw this comment in your patch regarding GTT restoration on resume.
> > I noticed this once I started relying on persistent GTT mappings across VT
> > switch in our GEM work -- the old X server and DRM code carefully unbind
> > all memory from the GTT on VT switch, but GEM does not bother.
> does this mean that it is now impossible to run several instances of X server?
We're getting closer, but DRM is still single-master, which means only
one X server. KMS and DRI2 both change how things work in this area, but
I believe there are few more DRM/X interactions which need fixing.
keith.packard at intel.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20080812/b67fe9e1/attachment.pgp
More information about the Intel-gfx