[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] i965: Add batch_flush_notify hook to create new vertex-buffer bo
cworth at cworth.org
Wed Dec 3 14:17:41 PST 2008
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 14:08 -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 13:53 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> If we drop the bits about active, won't the next header emit alloc the
> new vb for us?
That's how I wrote the patch first, but I found the server crashing with
a NULL vertex_buffer_bo in i965_composite where I'm trying to reloc it
into the batch.
So I responded to that with the active stuff. And maybe that wasn't
thought through well. Meanwhile, actually running my desktop session
with this patch in place, I'm regularly seeing an occasional glyph get
misplaced. So things are definitely not all correct with the patch yet.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20081203/44ff11c5/attachment.pgp
More information about the Intel-gfx