[Intel-gfx] x11perf -aa10text performance
xhejtman at ics.muni.cz
Thu Dec 11 01:02:45 PST 2008
On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 12:11:02AM +0100, Lukas Hejtmanek wrote:
> > Yes, the original patch as posted was buggy.
> > I've now pushed an improved version out to the master branch that should
> > not have this bug.
> > Any feedback on that would be most welcome.
Well, with UXA I can get 215000 glyphs/sec *without* the glyph cache in the
Xserver. With EXA I got only 66000 glyphs/sec. Is there something terribly
broken in Intel's EXA code or Xserver's EXA? I use Xserver 1.5.3 (from
Ubuntu). I run both UXA and EXA on the same Xserver.
More information about the Intel-gfx