[Intel-gfx] Ответ: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 188.8.131.521
gordon.jin at intel.com
Fri Mar 28 07:06:11 CET 2008
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote on Tuesday, March 25, 2008 6:09 PM:
> 2008/3/25, Jin, Gordon <gordon.jin at intel.com>:
>> Alexander E. Patrakov wrote on Monday, March 24, 2008 7:07 PM:
>>> This is the same as
>>> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14131, which
>>> (correctly) says that newer X server is needed. However, the
>>> documentation doesn't reflect this fact, and configure doesn't bail
>>> out with old Xorg (and, if old Xorg is unsupported and known to
>>> fail, then it should bail out). Should I reopen the bug for this
>>> request of documentation + configure script change?
>> This is a sync issue between xserver and 3d, and not an
>> xf86-video-intel issue.
> Of course you are a better specialist, but I don't see how this theory
> explains the fact that only the version of xf86-video-intel changed
> between the working and non-working 3D setup in Debian Lenny. Could
> you please explain the interaction in more detail or post a link to
> this explanation?
> Working: xserver-xorg-core 2:184.108.40.206.dfsg-12lenny2, libgl1-mesa-dri
> 7.0.3~rc2-1, xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.1.0-2
> Non-working (indirect rendering + severe flickering):
> xserver-xorg-core 2:220.127.116.11.dfsg-12lenny2, libgl1-mesa-dri
> 7.0.3~rc2-1, self-compiled xf86-video-intel 18.104.22.1681
To be honest, I'm not an expert for the interaction with old version stuff. All my work is on the latest codes. I just heard upgrading xserver resolved that issue so commented on the bugzilla. I agree it will be good if this could be documented better though.
More information about the Intel-gfx