[Intel-gfx] intel-cleanup branch
cworth at cworth.org
Fri Apr 24 20:06:50 CEST 2009
On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 16:13 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Cutting 10% of the total lines of code in the 2D driver seems like a good
> step towards reducing our maintenance burden. I still find new things to
> remove every time I look. But more importantly, the number of different
> combinations of paths goes way down -- XAA accel was way different from EXA,
> was way different from UXA, and XF86DRI has a whole bunch of ways to fail
> that's gone in DRI2.
I only skimmed the series, but everything I saw looks great!
I think we should land this soon and push out a snapshot with this so
that people can start testing.
Thanks so much for the great work, Eric!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the Intel-gfx