[Intel-gfx] 965 check_aperture/batch_start_atomic
eric at anholt.net
Mon Jan 19 21:12:07 PST 2009
Here's what I've been working on for converting our 965 3D code to
correctly using check_aperture and batch_start_atomic. This should fix
stinking piles of races/hangs/misrendering that would have been hard to track
down before (as we experienced last week with 915-class).
The series appears to work up until the last render commit, which I'm now too
bleary-eyed to spot the fail in.
Also, writing 3 965 3D rendering pipeline implementations sucks. Can I get
a credible X-on-GL already?
More information about the Intel-gfx