[Intel-gfx] progress on FBC regression bug?
jbarnes at virtuousgeek.org
Sun Nov 8 16:37:38 CET 2009
On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 10:02:44 +0100
Alexey Fisher <bug-track at fisher-privat.net> wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 07.11.2009, 14:53 -0800 schrieb Jesse Barnes:
> > Yeah I think that set of fixes was mainly for GM45... Anyway I'll
> > try to reproduce it.
> > Alexey Fisher <bug-track at fisher-privat.net> wrote:
> > >Am Samstag, den 07.11.2009, 10:37 -0800 schrieb Eric Anholt:
> > >> On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 09:37 +0100, Alexey Fisher wrote:
> > >> > Hallo Jesse,
> > >> >
> > >> > are there any work on the regression introduced by FBC patch?
> > >> > I was busy with ext4 corruption regression, so no intel
> > >> > testing was done. I see 2.6.32-rc6 still has this issue. Here
> > >> > are reg_dump diff befor and anfter resume, i hope this will
> > >> > help you to fix it(HW: "Vendor: 0x8086, Device: 0x27ae,
> > >> > Revision: 0x03 (??)" asus eeepc 1005ha):
> > >>
> > >> The fixes were merged after rc6.
> > >>
> > >Currently i use latest 2.6.32-rc6-00130-g5b8f0be
> > >anholt/drm-intel.git, are this fix here to? Because i have this
> > >issue on this kernel.
> Just curious, how do you test new kernel on netbook? Do you compile
> kernel on netbook or crosscompile it on some pc? Create deb/rps or
> normal install? Bisecting :) ?
I usually compile it on the notebook with the help of icecream, a
distributed compiler tool.
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
More information about the Intel-gfx