[Intel-gfx] progress on FBC regression bug?
bug-track at fisher-privat.net
Sun Nov 8 01:02:44 PST 2009
Am Samstag, den 07.11.2009, 14:53 -0800 schrieb Jesse Barnes:
> Yeah I think that set of fixes was mainly for GM45... Anyway I'll try to reproduce it.
> Alexey Fisher <bug-track at fisher-privat.net> wrote:
> >Am Samstag, den 07.11.2009, 10:37 -0800 schrieb Eric Anholt:
> >> On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 09:37 +0100, Alexey Fisher wrote:
> >> > Hallo Jesse,
> >> >
> >> > are there any work on the regression introduced by FBC patch? I was busy
> >> > with ext4 corruption regression, so no intel testing was done. I see
> >> > 2.6.32-rc6 still has this issue. Here are reg_dump diff befor and anfter
> >> > resume, i hope this will help you to fix it(HW: "Vendor: 0x8086, Device:
> >> > 0x27ae, Revision: 0x03 (??)" asus eeepc 1005ha):
> >> The fixes were merged after rc6.
> >Currently i use latest 2.6.32-rc6-00130-g5b8f0be anholt/drm-intel.git,
> >are this fix here to? Because i have this issue on this kernel.
Just curious, how do you test new kernel on netbook? Do you compile
kernel on netbook or crosscompile it on some pc? Create deb/rps or
normal install? Bisecting :) ?
More information about the Intel-gfx