[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Attempt to fix watermark setup on 85x
ajax at redhat.com
Fri Apr 16 15:04:59 PDT 2010
On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 10:24 +0800, ykzhao wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 02:03 +0800, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > IS_MOBILE() catches 85x, so we'd always try to use the 9xx FIFO sizing;
> > since there's an explicit 85x version, this seems wrong.
> Right. It seems that the incorrect get_fifo_size callback function is
> used for 85x.
> It seems that the i830 is also covered by the IS_MOBILE and then
> incorrect watermark callback function is used for I830.
So it is. Correct patch to follow.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the Intel-gfx