[Intel-gfx] [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.11.901
luto at mit.edu
Mon Jun 21 22:32:48 CEST 2010
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Andrew Lutomirski <luto at mit.edu> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes at virtuousgeek.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 19:44:10 -0700
>> Jesse Barnes <jbarnes at virtuousgeek.org> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 02:20:23 +0200
>>> Marc Deop i Argemí <damnshock at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > On Friday June 18 2010 02:17:53 Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>>> > > Neither patch applies for me.
>>> > One of them do apply for me, the other one doesn't.
>>> > Testing done on latest 2.6.35-rc3, the building fails.
>>> Arg, ok, I'll refresh them and post new ones tomorrow.
>> Ok here are some updated ones.
> Running these patches on 2.6.35-rc3 (plus the brown-paper-bag TCP fix,
> plus my hotplug_mask hack, plus my CRT regression fix) with
> xf86-video-intel be55066c6481b4c5e2cd39ef1c0f3be88cae0c93 (which is
> about a day old) seems stable and I don't have any visible corruption.
Just froze again. I moved my mouse and the screen turned black except
for the mouse cursor and a little underscore in the top left that
looked like the fbcon cursor.
Again, magic sysrq didn't work, which I'd imagine would help narrow
things down (presumably, no matter how hard the graphics hardware gets
wedged, magic sysrq should still work).
> That being said, if I rotate the screen, then typing becomes very
> annoyingly laggy. I have no idea whether that's a regression or not.
>> Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
>> Intel-gfx mailing list
>> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
More information about the Intel-gfx