[Intel-gfx] [Mesa3d-dev] i965 OpenGL is heavily broken again
maximlevitsky at gmail.com
Sat Mar 6 04:10:50 PST 2010
On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 11:18 +0100, Florian Mickler wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:48:48 +0200
> Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 13:36 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:18:07 +0200
> > > Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 12:55 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 22:42:21 +0200
> > > > > Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > After quite long period of inactivity, I updated graphical stack on my
> > > > > > desktop/server.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > To say the truth, I did such update about month ago, but found out that
> > > > > > X refuses flatly to use DRI modules. I assumed that it was my mistake in
> > > > > > compilation process (although it is automated).
> > > > >
> > > > > That generally indicates a build or config problem of some kind. Did
> > > > > you ever narrow it down?
> > > > Because the same compile process works now, I suspect that wasn't build
> > > > failure.
> > >
> > > Well something weird is going on; maybe you didn't build X after Mesa
> > > or with the right Mesa includes?
> > I am very sure that this issue isn't relevant now.
> > I do compile (libdrm, mesa, xserver, xf86-intel, and evdev driver in
> > that order, compiling everything from scratch (doing git clean -dfx in
> > all directories)
> if you just want a working setup, perhaps you should try using
> something that got (probably) tested by at least some people:
Well, I now have a working setup with mesa
The problem is that I hoped that once all heavy work in regard to KMS
was done, there will be no serious regressions in 3D stack, but only bug
fixes, because it is very hard to track and fix bugs there.
However, once again 3D stack is in bad shape, and this is not good.
More information about the Intel-gfx