[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/14] intel_ringbuffer.c reorg + cleanups
daniel at ffwll.ch
Fri Apr 13 03:56:44 PDT 2012
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 04:42:13PM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 22:12:45 +0200, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > This patch series is inspired by Ben's ring->get|put_irq cleanup for gen6+ and
> > my perpetual hatred for intel_ringbuffer.c.
> > It's a lot of churn, but the end result is imho worth it - I almost started to
> > like what the ringbuffer abstraction looks like now. There are some follow-up
> > cleanups possible, but I think that can wait until we've cleanup up our domain
> > tracking and ripped out the flushing_list (if that ever happens).
> > Commments, flames and review highly welcome.
> This is so nice. It's way better than the series I started with when
> working on domain tracking lobotomy.
tbh it's far from my first attempt at this, and I've dodged the domain
tracking things mostly by leaving the ring->flush code as-is.
> Except for a s/bds/bsd/ in patch 4's commit message,
Fixed, same for the s/ring->flush/ring->add_request/ noticed by Ben.
> Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <eric at anholt.net>
Thanks for the review, all queued for -next. Imo Ben's concerns are valid,
but better tackled in follow up patches.
Mail: daniel at ffwll.ch
Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48
More information about the Intel-gfx