[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: check gtfifodbg after possibly failed writes
ben at bwidawsk.net
Wed Feb 8 02:34:42 PST 2012
On 02/08/2012 11:28 AM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 11:15:58 +0100, Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote:
>> Bit a bikeshed comment, but I prefer explicit control flow instead of
>> playing tricks with the short-circuiting behaviour of &&. Mind if you can
>> change that, too?
> Whilst we're on the subject of bikesheds, having an explicit tracepoint
> for forcewake get/put would have answered a query I just had.
I'll do it if you'll review it.
More information about the Intel-gfx