[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915: expose energy counter on SNB and IVB

[Ben Widawsky]

On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 12:03:37 +0200
Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 01:54:10PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes at virtuousgeek.org>
> > 
> > On SNB and IVB, there's an MSR (also exposed through MCHBAR) we can use
> > to read out the amount of energy used over time.  Expose this in sysfs
> > to make it easy to do power comparisons with different configurations.
> > 
> > If the platform supports it, the file will show up under the
> > drm/card0/power subdirectory of the PCI device in sysfs as gt_energy_uJ.
> > The value in the file is a running total of energy (in microjoules)
> > consumed by the graphics device.
> > 
> > v2: move to sysfs (Ben, Daniel)
> >     expose a simple value (Chris)
> >     drop unrelated hunk (Ben)
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes at virtuousgeek.org>
> > 
> > v3: by Ben
> > Tied it into existing rc6  sysfs entries and named that a more generic
> > "power attrs." Fixed rebase conflicts.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben at bwidawsk.net>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h   |  2 ++
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >  2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > index d0b60f2..0e34f5f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > @@ -1242,6 +1242,8 @@
> >  #define CLKCFG_MEM_800					(3 << 4)
> >  #define CLKCFG_MEM_MASK					(7 << 4)
> >  
> > +#define SECP_NRG_STTS			(MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE_SNB + 0x592c)
> > +
> >  #define TSC1			0x11001
> >  #define   TSE			(1<<0)
> >  #define TR1			0x11006
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c
> > index e3a31ae..6bbc9af 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c
> > @@ -76,22 +76,43 @@ show_rc6pp_ms(struct device *kdev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> >  	return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%u", rc6pp_residency);
> >  }
> >  
> > +#define MSR_IA32_PACKAGE_POWER_SKU_UNIT		0x00000606
> > +
> > +static ssize_t
> > +show_gt_energy_uJ(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> > +{
> > +	struct drm_minor *dminor = container_of(dev, struct drm_minor, kdev);
> > +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dminor->dev->dev_private;
> > +	u64 ppsu;
> > +	u32 val, units;
> > +
> > +	rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_PACKAGE_POWER_SKU_UNIT, ppsu);
> > +
> > +	ppsu = (ppsu & 0x1f00) >> 8;
> > +	units = 1000000 / (1 << ppsu); /* convert to uJ */
> > +	val = I915_READ(SECP_NRG_STTS);
> > +
> > +	return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%u", val * units);
> 
> Besides that this could overflow it also introduces rounding errors that
> accumulate. I guess we need a 64 mul+div here, like in the residency
> counters.
> -Daniel
> 

Jesse, I'm not fixing this one for you since I screwed up the residency
math enough times before.

> > +}
> > +
> >  static DEVICE_ATTR(rc6_enable, S_IRUGO, show_rc6_mask, NULL);
> >  static DEVICE_ATTR(rc6_residency_ms, S_IRUGO, show_rc6_ms, NULL);
> >  static DEVICE_ATTR(rc6p_residency_ms, S_IRUGO, show_rc6p_ms, NULL);
> >  static DEVICE_ATTR(rc6pp_residency_ms, S_IRUGO, show_rc6pp_ms, NULL);
> > +static DEVICE_ATTR(gt_energy_uJ, S_IRUGO, show_gt_energy_uJ, NULL);
> >  
> > -static struct attribute *rc6_attrs[] = {
> > +static struct attribute *power_attrs[] = {
> >  	&dev_attr_rc6_enable.attr,
> >  	&dev_attr_rc6_residency_ms.attr,
> >  	&dev_attr_rc6p_residency_ms.attr,
> >  	&dev_attr_rc6pp_residency_ms.attr,
> > +	&dev_attr_gt_energy_uJ.attr,
> >  	NULL
> >  };
> >  
> >  static struct attribute_group rc6_attr_group = {
> >  	.name = power_group_name,
> > -	.attrs =  rc6_attrs
> > +	.attrs =  power_attrs
> >  };
> >  #endif
> >  
> > -- 
> > 1.7.12
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> 



-- 
Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center