[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/9] drm-intel-collector - update

Rodrigo Vivi rodrigo.vivi at gmail.com
Tue Nov 19 03:35:06 CET 2013


Hi Daniel,

could you help me to assign best reviewers for these patches?
also, please let me know if I should just remove patch 1 out from -collector.

Thanks in advance,
Rodrigo.

On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This is another drm-intel-collector updated notice:
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~vivijim/drm-intel/log/?h=drm-intel-collector
>
> Here goes the update list in order for better reviewers assignment:
>
> Patch     drm/i915: Asynchronously perform the set-base for a simple modeset - Reviewed by me.
> Patch     drm/i915: Fix gen3/4 vblank counter wraparound - Reviewer:
> Patch     drm/i915: Use frame counter for intel_wait_for_vblank() on CTG - Reviewer:
> Patch     drm/i915: Do hw quiescing first during unload - Reviewer:
> Patch     drm/i915: print object bindings in debugfs - Reviewer:
> Patch     drm/i915/vlv: enable HDMI audio for Valleyview2 - Reviewer:
> Patch     drm/i915: Hold pc8 lock around toggling pc8.gpu_idle - Reviewed by Paulo
> Patch     drm/i915: Do not enable package C8 on unsupported hardware - Reviewed by Paulo
> Patch     drm/i915: Enable pipe gamma for sprites - Reviewer:
>
> Overall Process:
>
> drm-intel-collector - review request
>  1. Daniel pushs drm-intel-testing (every 2 weeks)
>  2. I rebase drm-intel-collector onto drm-intel-testing
>  3. Add Reviewer: tag with voluntered reviewers. If you don't believe you should be assigned on a particular patch please don't get mad just tell you wont review or volunteer someone else.
>  4. I resubmit remaining patches for review without picking any new (drm-intel-collector - review request)
>
> drm-intel-collector - updated
>  5. One week later I collect all simple (1-2) patches that wasn't yet reviewed and not queued by Daniel from one testing update until another.
>  6. Request automated QA's PRTS automated i-g-t tests comparing drm-intel-testing x drm-intel-collector
>  7. If tests are ok I send the update notification or the patches as a series to intel-gfx mailing list for better tracking and to be reviewed. (drm-intel-collector - updated)
>  8. Let me know volunteers for review new patches and also let me know if I've picked any patch that I shouldn't.
>
> There are some reasons that some patches can be left behind:
> 1. Your patch didn't applied cleanly and I couldn't easily solve the conflicts.
> 2. Kernel didn't compiled with your patch.
> 3. I simply missed it. If you believe this is the case please warn me.
>
> Please help me to get these patches reviewed and queued by Daniel.
>
> Also, please let me know if you have further ideas how to improve this process.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Rodrigo.
>
>
> Chris Wilson (4):
>   drm/i915: Asynchronously perform the set-base for a simple modeset
>   drm/i915: Do hw quiescing first during unload
>   drm/i915: Hold pc8 lock around toggling pc8.gpu_idle
>   drm/i915: Do not enable package C8 on unsupported hardware
>
> Daniel Vetter (1):
>   drm/i915: print object bindings in debugfs
>
> Mengdong Lin (1):
>   drm/i915/vlv: enable HDMI audio for Valleyview2
>
> Ville Syrjälä (3):
>   drm/i915: Fix gen3/4 vblank counter wraparound
>   drm/i915: Use frame counter for intel_wait_for_vblank() on CTG
>   drm/i915: Enable pipe gamma for sprites
>
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c  |  6 ++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c      | 10 +++---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h      |  1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c      |  2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h      | 20 ++++++++++-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c  | 18 ++++++++++
>  7 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>



-- 
Rodrigo Vivi
Blog: http://blog.vivi.eng.br



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list