[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/15] drm/i915: ns2501 is on DVOB

[Ville Syrjälä]

On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 06:57:43PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 07:15:53PM +0300, ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > 
> > On Fujitsu-Siememens S6010 the ns2501 chip is hooked up to DVOB instead
> > of DVOC.
> > 
> > FIXME: Maybe need to dig out the correct DVO port from VBT
> 
> Well we could have 2 match structs for dvoc and dvob. I guess on Thomas'
> X30 it is actually on dvob, otherwise he wouldn't have picked that one ...

Sure, but we can't probe the DVO port so we need to use VBT/DMI/something
to figure out which one to pick. In theory VBT should have information.

> -Daniel
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dvo.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dvo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dvo.c
> > index 5d7d975..be560bb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dvo.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dvo.c
> > @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static const struct intel_dvo_device intel_dvo_devices[] = {
> >  	{
> >  	        .type = INTEL_DVO_CHIP_TMDS,
> >  		.name = "ns2501",
> > -		.dvo_reg = DVOC,
> > +		.dvo_reg = DVOB,
> >  		.slave_addr = NS2501_ADDR,
> >  		.dev_ops = &ns2501_ops,
> >         }
> > -- 
> > 1.8.5.5
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> 
> -- 
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC