[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915/vlv: Added a rendering specific Hw WA 'WaTlbInvalidateStoreDataBefore'

Chris Wilson chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Mon Mar 24 10:32:01 CET 2014


On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 12:19:19PM +0530, sourab.gupta at intel.com wrote:
> From: Akash Goel <akash.goel at intel.com>
> 
> Added a new rendering specific Workaround 'WaTlbInvalidateStoreDataBefore'.
> In this WA, before pipecontrol with TLB invalidate set, need to add 2 MI
> Store data commands.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Akash Goel <akash.goel at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sourab Gupta <sourab.gupta at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> index 87d1a2d..2812384 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> @@ -2207,6 +2207,28 @@ intel_ring_invalidate_all_caches(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring)
>  	uint32_t flush_domains;
>  	int ret;
>  
> +	if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(ring->dev)) {
The ring flushes are vfuncs, so why is this here and not in a special
vlv ring flush?

> +		/*
> +		 * WaTlbInvalidateStoreDataBefore:vlv
> +		 * Before pipecontrol with TLB invalidate set, need 2 store
> +		 * data commands (such as MI_STORE_DATA_IMM or MI_STORE_DATA_INDEX)
> +		 * Without this, hardware cannot guarantee the command after the
> +		 * PIPE_CONTROL with TLB inv will not use the old TLB values.

Crumbs, it sounds like our i-g-t are not sensitive enough. This bug
crops up in many disguises over the years, do you have any suggestion on
how we can improve our tests?

> +		 */
> +		int i;
> +		ret = intel_ring_begin(ring, 4 * 2);

This can be we written to use 6 dwords.

> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +		for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
> +			intel_ring_emit(ring, MI_STORE_DWORD_INDEX);
> +			intel_ring_emit(ring, I915_GEM_HWS_SCRATCH_INDEX <<
> +						MI_STORE_DWORD_INDEX_SHIFT);

This is I915_GEM_HWS_SCRATCH_ADDR

> +			intel_ring_emit(ring, 0);
> +			intel_ring_emit(ring, MI_NOOP);
> +		}
> +		intel_ring_advance(ring);
> +	}
> +
>  	flush_domains = 0;
>  	if (ring->gpu_caches_dirty)
>  		flush_domains = I915_GEM_GPU_DOMAINS;

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list