[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Ignore SURFLIVE and flip counter when the GPU gets reset

Jani Nikula jani.nikula at linux.intel.com
Fri Nov 21 08:43:08 CET 2014


On Fri, 24 Oct 2014, Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 09:33:09PM +0300, ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com wrote:
>> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
>> 
>> During a GPU reset we need to get pending page flip cleared out
>> since the ring contents are gone and flip will never complete
>> on its own. This used to work until the mmio vs. CS flip race
>> detection came about. That piece of code is looking for a
>> specific surface address in the SURFLIVE register, but as
>> a flip to that address may never happen the check may never
>> pass. So we should just skip the SURFLIVE and flip counter
>> checks when the GPU gets reset.
>> 
>> intel_display_handle_reset() tries to effectively complete
>> the flip anyway by calling .update_primary_plane(). But that
>> may not satisfy the conditions of the mmio vs. CS race
>> detection since there's no guarantee that a modeset didn't
>> sneak in between the GPU reset and intel_display_handle_reset().
>> When that happens the primary plane updates performed by
>> intel_display_handle_reset() will already use the new surface
>> address, and thus the surface address the flip is waiting for
>> might never appear in SURFLIVE. The result is that the flip
>> will never complete and attempts to perform further page flips
>> will fail with -EBUSY.
>> 
>> During the GPU reset intel_crtc_has_pending_flip() will return
>> false regardless, so the deadlock with a modeset vs. the error
>> work acquiring crtc->mutex was avoided. And the reset_counter
>> check in intel_crtc_has_pending_flip() actually made this bug
>> even less severe since it allowed normal modesets to go through
>> even though there's a pending flip.
>> 
>> This is a regression introduced by me here:
>>  commit 75f7f3ec600524c9544cc31695155f1a9ddbe1d9
>>  Author: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
>>  Date:   Tue Apr 15 21:41:34 2014 +0300
>> 
>>     drm/i915: Fix mmio vs. CS flip race on ILK+
>> 
>> Testcase: igt/kms_flip/flip-vs-panning-vs-hang
>> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
>
> So I wondered first how we'll get there since the set_base code waits for
> pageflips before updating anything. Except it doesn't when there's a
> pending gpu reset. I don't think we need Chris' additional paranoi since
> we must complete the pageflip anyway, and we do it with hacks when there's
> a gpu reset. So if the commit message gets augmented with some note that
> the pageflip wait in set_base is short-circuited for resets this is
>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org

Finally pushed to drm-intel-fixes. Thanks for the patch and review. And
the reminder.

I guess I ignored this because there was a highly negative review when
the patch was posted, and I didn't pay enough attention to notice the
change of mind that happened months later. Sorry.


BR,
Jani.



>
> Cheers, Daniel
>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 4 ++++
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> index 94ac51f..cb9dd8e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> @@ -8895,6 +8895,10 @@ static bool page_flip_finished(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
>>  	struct drm_device *dev = crtc->base.dev;
>>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>>  
>> +	if (i915_reset_in_progress(&dev_priv->gpu_error) ||
>> +	    crtc->reset_counter != atomic_read(&dev_priv->gpu_error.reset_counter))
>> +		return true;
>> +
>>  	/*
>>  	 * The relevant registers doen't exist on pre-ctg.
>>  	 * As the flip done interrupt doesn't trigger for mmio
>> -- 
>> 1.8.5.5
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Intel-gfx mailing list
>> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
> -- 
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list