[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Don't restrict i915_wa_registers to BDW

Siluvery, Arun arun.siluvery at linux.intel.com
Mon Sep 1 13:33:50 CEST 2014


On 30/08/2014 16:51, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> We have CHV code that already makes the test obsolete. Besides, when
> num_wa_regs is 0 (platforms not gathering that W/A data), we expose
> something sensible already.
>
> Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau at intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 5 -----
>   1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index fc3d582a..cd4f045 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -2636,11 +2636,6 @@ static int i915_wa_registers(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
>   	struct drm_device *dev = node->minor->dev;
>   	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>
> -	if (!IS_BROADWELL(dev)) {
> -		DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Workaround table not available !!\n");
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -	}
> -
>   	ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&dev->struct_mutex);
>   	if (ret)
>   		return ret;
>
This can also be taken, so patches 1 and 5 in this series.
Reviewed-by: Arun Siluvery <arun.siluvery at linux.intel.com>

regards
Arun




More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list