[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/hdmi: Compute port_clock for 27.027 pixel replicated modes

[Clint Taylor]

On 09/26/2014 08:58 AM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 03:49:39PM -0700, clinton.a.taylor at intel.com wrote:
>> From: Clint Taylor <clinton.a.taylor at intel.com>
>>
>> port_clock was being incorrectly computed and WRPLL was incorrectly
>> programmed for pixel doubled modes using a 27.027MHz pixel clock.
>> port_clock was set to 27.026 resulting in an output pixel clock
>> matching 27.000MHz.
>
> I don't understand how this 27.000MHz clock would come about. Can you
> explain further?
>
>> Since there is no way to correctly half the 27.027
>> frequency as an integer just set port_clock to 27027 for these modes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Clint Taylor <clinton.a.taylor at intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c |    5 +++++
>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c
>> index 29ec153..a0786d6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c
>> @@ -933,6 +933,11 @@ bool intel_hdmi_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>>
>>   	if (adjusted_mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_DBLCLK) {
>>   		pipe_config->pixel_multiplier = 2;
>> +
>> +		/* Fix up port_clock since 27027 is not divisible by 2 */
>> +		if (pipe_config->adjusted_mode.crtc_clock == 13513) {
>> +			pipe_config->port_clock = 27027;
>> +		}
>
> Ugh. Oh well I suppose we'll want to be as accurate as possible. Would
> be nice if would could someone do this fixup already in drm core, but
> that would probably require changing to smaller clock units all over
> the place which doesn't sound fun at all. So I guess we get to leave
> the kludge in the driver :(
>
> This also got me thinking about the 12bpc case as well. It's clearly
> busted with double clocked modes now. Care to fix that up as well?
>
> PS. did you ever send that separate patch to fix up the interlace
> flags in some of the double clocked modes? I don't remember seeing
> such a patch at least.

Actually I just checked again and it was the 576i at 100Hz modes and they 
are still incorrect. Let me send out the patch.

>
>>   	}
>>
>>   	if (intel_hdmi->color_range)
>> --
>> 1.7.9.5
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Intel-gfx mailing list
>> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>