[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/17] drm/i915: Add and implement the debugfs 'show' functions for Displayport compliance

Todd Previte tprevite at gmail.com
Wed Feb 18 08:45:32 PST 2015


On 12/17/14 1:12 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 05:00:38PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
>> 2014-12-10 21:53 GMT-02:00 Todd Previte<tprevite at gmail.com>:
>>> +               if (intel_encoder->type == INTEL_OUTPUT_DISPLAYPORT) {
>>> +                       if (intel_encoder->new_crtc) {
>>> +                               crtc_config = &intel_encoder->new_crtc->config;
>>> +                               pipe_bpp = crtc_config->pipe_bpp;
>>> +                               mode = &crtc_config->adjusted_mode;
>>> +                               hres = mode->hdisplay;
>>> +                               vres = mode->vdisplay;
>>> +                       } else if (intel_encoder->base.crtc) {
>>> +                               icrtc = to_intel_crtc(intel_encoder->base.crtc);
>>> +                               pipe_bpp = icrtc->config.pipe_bpp;
>>> +                               mode = &icrtc->config.adjusted_mode;
>>> +                               hres = mode->hdisplay;
>>> +                               vres = mode->vdisplay;
>>> +                       } else {
>>> +                               pipe_bpp = 0;
>>> +                               hres = vres = 0;
>>> +                       }
>> Why do you have this new_crtc vs current_crtc vs no crtc distinction
>> here? Is it really necessary? Shouldn't the "DP testing debugfs
>> protocol" establish when exactly the information should be queried,
>> and then give some errors in case information is being requested at
>> the wrong time?
> Presuming adequate locking exists (haven't checked tbh) new_* pointers always
> match the equivalent base pointers. new_ pointers/structures are
> exclusively for modeset code (and specifically state computation). I guess
> the new_crtc case needs to be dropped here.
> -Daniel
I tested this again with the new_crtc case removed and it appears to 
work correctly. So the new_crtc case has been removed. The changes have 
been integrated into the monster patch.

-T


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list