[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] sna: Correct misspelled cacheing->caching in comments

[Sedat Dilek]

On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 07:45:42AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> I have seen this typo once and added an entry to codespell's dictionary.txt file.
>>
>> $ diff -uprN /usr/share/codespell/dictionary.txt.orig /usr/share/codespell/dictionary.txt
>> --- /usr/share/codespell/dictionary.txt.orig    2015-06-09 20:49:25.000000000 +0200
>> +++ /usr/share/codespell/dictionary.txt 2015-06-23 07:37:35.893689539 +0200
>> @@ -625,6 +625,7 @@ burried->buried
>>  busineses->business, businesses,
>>  busness->business
>>  bussiness->business
>> +cacheing->caching
>>  caculater->calculator
>>  cacuses->caucuses
>>  cahracters->characters
>>
>> There some other places where this typo occurs:
>>
>> [ src/sna/kgem.c ]
>>
>>  298:static void assert_cacheing(struct kgem *kgem, struct kgem_bo *bo)
>>  324:#define assert_cacheing(kgem, bo)
>> 2455:  assert_cacheing(kgem, bo);
>> 2841:  assert_cacheing(kgem, bo);
>>
>> It's up to Chris what to do with this.
>
> I just can't get paste reading 'caching' as two hard Cs and so it feels
> weird.
>
> commit f414ed4e40292e91e9c6850fb01a26334e6b43c7
> Author: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Date:   Wed Jun 24 11:02:28 2015 +0100
>
>     sna: Fix misspelling of "caching"
>
>     Apply s/cacheing/caching/ because I am alone in my belief of how to
>     spell cacheing correctly :)
>
>     Suggested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com>
>     Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
>

Thanks.

Just FYI... codespell got it, now.

commit b003c6167fdf441d2ba89534d402015723b66560
"Add misspelled cacheing->caching"

- sed@ -

[1] https://github.com/lucasdemarchi/codespell/commit/b003c6167fdf441d2ba89534d402015723b66560