[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] mfd: Add GPIOLIB dependency if INTEL_SOC_PMIC is to be enabled

[Daniel Vetter]

On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 10:15:03AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jul 2015, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones at linaro.org> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 22 Jul 2015, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > >> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 02:01:44PM +0530, Shobhit Kumar wrote:
> > >> > This is needed as the CRC PMIC has support for Panel
> > >> > enable/diable as gpio which needs 'gpiod_add_lookup_table'
> > >> > and 'gpiod_remove_lookup_table' from gpiolib. This patch
> > >> > can be squashed with below commit in topic/crc-pmic branch
> > >> >
> > >> >     commit 61dd2ca2d44e493b050adbbb75bc50db11c367dd
> > >> >     Author: Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar at intel.com>
> > >> >     Date:   Fri Jun 26 14:32:05 2015 +0530
> > >> >
> > >> >     mfd: intel_soc_pmic_core: Add lookup table for Panel Control as GPIO
> > >> >     signal
> > >> >
> > >> >     On some Intel SoC platforms, the panel enable/disable signals
> > >> >     are controlled by CRC PMIC. Add those control as a new GPIO in a
> > >> >     lookup table for gpio-crystalcove chip during CRC driver load
> > >> >
> > >> > Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones at linaro.org>
> > >> > Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij at linaro.org>
> > >> > Signed-off-by: Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar at intel.com>
> > >>
> > >> Applied, thanks.
> > >
> > > You can't just apply changes made to other subsystems willy-nilly.
> > >
> > > You should wait for an Ack, despite the triviality of the patch, even
> > > if it's just out of courtesy.
> > 
> > Sorry about that, figured getting rid of the compile fail asap is
> > better. Should I revert it again and update the pull request?
> 
> It's fine.  Just please bear it in mind for the future.

Sure will wait for ack the next time around.

Thanks, Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch