[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Remove mostly unused variable in intel_rotate_fb_obj_pages

[Tvrtko Ursulin]

On 06/24/2015 08:38 AM, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> On ti, 2015-06-23 at 12:57 +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
>>
>> It is only used in logging and it doesn't need to exist on its own.
>>
>
> Comment below.
>
> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com>
>
>> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
>> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c | 7 +++----
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
>> index a8c33f7..c1c16b0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
>> @@ -2702,7 +2702,7 @@ intel_rotate_fb_obj_pages(struct i915_ggtt_view *ggtt_view,
>>   {
>>   	struct drm_device *dev = obj->base.dev;
>>   	struct intel_rotation_info *rot_info = &ggtt_view->rotation_info;
>> -	unsigned long size, pages, rot_pages;
>> +	unsigned long pages, rot_pages;
>>   	struct sg_page_iter sg_iter;
>>   	unsigned long i;
>>   	dma_addr_t *page_addr_list;
>> @@ -2720,7 +2720,6 @@ intel_rotate_fb_obj_pages(struct i915_ggtt_view *ggtt_view,
>>   	width_pages = DIV_ROUND_UP(rot_info->pitch, tile_pitch);
>>   	height_pages = DIV_ROUND_UP(rot_info->height, tile_height);
>>   	rot_pages = width_pages * height_pages;
>> -	size = rot_pages * PAGE_SIZE;
>>
>>   	/* Allocate a temporary list of source pages for random access. */
>>   	page_addr_list = drm_malloc_ab(pages, sizeof(dma_addr_t));
>> @@ -2748,7 +2747,7 @@ intel_rotate_fb_obj_pages(struct i915_ggtt_view *ggtt_view,
>>
>>   	DRM_DEBUG_KMS(
>>   		      "Created rotated page mapping for object size %lu (pitch=%u, height=%u, pixel_format=0x%x, %ux%u tiles, %lu pages).\n",
>> -		      size, rot_info->pitch, rot_info->height,
>> +		      obj->base.size, rot_info->pitch, rot_info->height,
>
> This will display a possibly differing size than before, but that's the
> point, right?

Yes, not the best commit message. I'll update and re-send.

Thanks,

Tvrtko