[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 27/49] drm/i915: Use a separate slab for requests

Chris Wilson chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Fri Mar 27 07:27:42 PDT 2015


On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 03:20:08PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 11:01:59AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > requests are even more frequently allocated than objects and equally
> > benefit from having a dedicated slab.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> 
> vmas, while we're at it?

As a second patch probably. The test cases I was looking at stressed
requests rather than ctx. Though if we get a lightweight full-ppgtt,
there are a few synmark that would definitely benefit from a vmas slab.
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list