[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm: Kernel Crash in drm_unlock

He, Shuang shuang.he at intel.com
Tue Mar 31 06:53:05 PDT 2015


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf
> Of Damien Lespiau
> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 9:44 PM
> To: Antoine, Peter
> Cc: intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm: Kernel Crash in drm_unlock
> 
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 02:38:15PM +0100, Antoine, Peter wrote:
> > Patch ordering, is deliberate. They are not dependent on each other.
> > I'll rebase and add the new  dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org when is
> > resubmit the patches.
> 
> Ah, well, huummm. That is something new and innovative for sure. I
> haven't seen any precedent for this one. I'd rather we always do the
> same thing to makes tools easier to write on top of the upstream
> mailing-list centered process, otherwise it'll be painful. For instance
> is PRTS going to cope? patchwork now sees all the patches as 1/3:
> 
>   http://patchwork.lespiau.name/series/1290/
[He, Shuang] PRTS is treating each one as a single patch

Thanks
	--Shuang
> 
> We could make the tool understand that, but I believe it'll be much
> easier if we stick to the somewhat established conventions.
> 
> HTH,
> 
> --
> Damien
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list