[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/22] drm: Add set property support for color manager

Emil Velikov emil.l.velikov at gmail.com
Fri Oct 9 15:25:33 PDT 2015


Hi Shashank,

On 9 October 2015 at 20:28, Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma at intel.com> wrote:
> As per DRM color manager design, if a userspace wants to set a correction
> blob, it prepares it and sends the blob_id to kernel via set_property
> call. DRM framework takes this blob_id, gets the blob, and saves it
> in the CRTC state, so that, during the atomic_commit, the color correction
> values from the blob can referred and applied on display controller
> registers.
>
> This patch adds this set_property support for color correction blobs
> in drm framework.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kausal malladi <kausalmalladi at gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> index 7bb3845..0b286d2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> @@ -390,6 +390,38 @@ int drm_atomic_set_mode_prop_for_crtc(struct drm_crtc_state *state,
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_atomic_set_mode_prop_for_crtc);
>
>  /**
> + * drm_atomic_crtc_set_blob - find and set a blob
> + * @state_blob: reference pointer to the color blob in the crtc_state
> + * @blob_id: blob_id coming from set_property() call
> + *
> + * Set a color correction blob (originating from a set blob property) on the
> + * desired CRTC state. This function will take reference of the blob property
> + * in the CRTC state, finds the blob based on blob_id (which comes from
> + * set_property call) and set the blob at the proper place.
> + *
> + * RETURNS:
> + * Zero on success, error code on failure.
> + */
> +int drm_atomic_crtc_set_blob(struct drm_device *dev,
> +       struct drm_property_blob **state_blob, uint32_t blob_id)
You are missing the function declaration. Set it as static perhaps ?

Regards,
Emil


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list