[PATCH v0 01/14] IB/hfi1, IB/qib: Make I2C terminology more inclusive

Leon Romanovsky leon at kernel.org
Wed Apr 3 08:30:25 UTC 2024


On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 05:00:25PM +0000, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
> I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C specifications have replaced "master/slave"
> with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following on to Wolfram's series
> to fix drivers/i2c[1], fix the terminology where I had a role to play, now that
> the approved verbiage exists in the specification.
> 
> Compile tested, no functionality changes intended
> 
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240322132619.6389-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Easwar Hariharan <eahariha at linux.microsoft.com>
> ---
>  drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/chip.c           |  6 ++--
>  drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/chip.h           |  2 +-
>  drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/chip_registers.h |  2 +-
>  drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/file_ops.c       |  2 +-
>  drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/firmware.c       | 22 ++++++-------
>  drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/pcie.c           |  2 +-
>  drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/qsfp.c           | 36 ++++++++++-----------
>  drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/user_exp_rcv.c   |  2 +-
>  drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_twsi.c        |  6 ++--
>  9 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

hfi1 and qib work perfectly fine with the current terminology. There is
no need to change old code just for the sake of change.

Let's drop this patch.

Thanks


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list