<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/strict.dtd"><html><head><meta name="qrichtext" content="1" /><style type="text/css">p, li { white-space: pre-wrap; }</style></head><body style=" font-family:'DejaVu Sans'; font-size:8pt; font-weight:200; font-style:normal;">On Sunday 29 March 2009 15:51:51 Thomas Bächler wrote:<br>
> This is a summary of my experience with latest Intel developments: All<br>
> comments below apply to a KDE 4.2 Desktop with compositing enabled on<br>
> Arch Linux x86_64 and an Intel 945GM / Core 2 Duo CPU.<br>
><br>
> - 2.4 driver, Linux 2.6.28 and older, don't remember the Mesa version:<br>
> Using EXA, performance was okay, but not very good. Leaked a few hundred<br>
> MB of memory within a week of active usage.<br>
><br>
> - 2.6 driver, Linux 2.6.28, Mesa 7.3:<br>
> Using EXA, the performance is bad, you can count the FPS with the bare eye.<br>
> Using UXA, it is amazingly fast (faster as ever before), but it leaks<br>
> hundreds of megabytes of memory within hours. After two or three<br>
> suspend/resume cycles and one day of active usage, the X server uses<br>
> over 1GB of memory! Even without suspend/resume cycles, it may use over<br>
> 500MB of memory within only 6 hours.<br>
> This applies to both the 2.6.3 and 2.6.99.902 driver.<br>
><br>
> - 2.6 driver, Linux 2.6.29, Mesa 7.3<br>
> Using EXA or UXA, the performance is very bad (as with EXA in the above<br>
> section), I have to disable compositing to be able to work at all. This<br>
> seems like a huge performance regression in 2.6.29! It is the same with<br>
> and without KMS enabled.<br>
> I can't say anything about the memory problems, as I didn't use it with<br>
> compositing long enough to find out.<br>
><br>
> - 2.6 driver, linux-2.6.git tree, Mesa 7.3<br>
> Basically, same as the last section, except the "weird colors" are fixed<br>
> when enabling KMS.<br>
><br>
> So my question is:<br>
> 1) How do I get composite performance back with 2.6.29 and newer kernels?<br>
> 2) How do I get rid of the massive memory leaks I experience with UXA?<br>
><br>
> Thanks for your replies. I hope me joining this mailing list can help<br>
> sorting these problems out, as sadly the intel driver is becoming less<br>
> useful for me over time.<br>
<p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p>Same experience here :'(<br>
<p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p>Furthermore, I've suffered the same running on gnome (for a moment I thought it was kde4's fault) and compiz.<br>
<p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p>Right now I'm trying on fluxbox, I'll get back to you all in a couple of days after trying this out although it seems all might be a X server bug (by what I've read so far)<br>
<p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p>Damnshock<br>
<p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p></body></html>